parallelgrapefruit at gmail.com
Wed Jan 28 02:39:48 CET 2009
On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 8:32 PM, Gregory Meyer <greg at gkmeyer.com> wrote:
> What I was expressing was my opinion about the matter. It is entirely up to
> everyone else that has to cast votes what to do for themselves. Besides, I
> wasn't suggesting he get a free ride, I was just pointing out that the body
> of work that Mark has produced makes him at least as worthy, if not more so,
> than anybody or everyone else. That's not a free ride in my eyes.
My feeling this is:
- We're not voting (or shouldn't be voting) on the board based on
technical skills/ability/contributions in technical parts of amarok.
This is not about determining Amarok's future or guidance, but solely
to deal with financial issues, and how money gets spent. (Which is
why, incidentally, I'd be horrible on the board--I'd spend it all on
prostitutes and alchohol)
As the board is designed around financial matters, things that I
personally look at are the domain name adventure from a while back
reguarding amarok.org.... and turning into amarok.[every Country code
known to man], as thats the only background information I have to make
such a judgement.
> On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 8:17 PM, Lydia Pintscher <lydia at kde.org> wrote:
>> On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 2:15 AM, Ian Monroe <ian.monroe at gmail.com> wrote:
>> > Whats with this attitude that discussion things up to vote is
>> > tantamount to trying to overturn the will of the voters. No one is
>> > talking about a free ride.
>> > Ian
>> That is exactly what Greg suggested in my eyes.
>> Sorry if that was not his intention.
>> Lydia Pintscher
>> Amarok community manager
>> kde.org - amarok.kde.org - kubuntu.org
>> Amarok-devel mailing list
>> Amarok-devel at kde.org
> Amarok-devel mailing list
> Amarok-devel at kde.org
More information about the Amarok-devel