New website theme, when to roll out?

Harald Sitter sitter.harald at gmail.com
Thu Apr 10 05:49:31 CEST 2008


On Wed, 2008-04-09 at 21:46 +0200, Mark Kretschmann wrote:
> Heya,
> 
> emunkki (Pasi Lallinaho) has designed a new website theme for us. It's
> been worked on for quite a while and went through many iterations, and
> I think the latest mockup looks really neat:
> 
> http://projects.knome.ath.cx/amarok/WWW/
> 
> In my opinion this design is way better than our current old and
> trusty design, and we should roll it out ASAP (as soon as the details
> have been worked out).
> 
> Now a heated discussion has started about the right time for going
> live with the new theme. I (and also Ian Monroe) would like to see
> this implemented soon. Let me summarize our reasons:
> 
> 1) Release early, release often
> 2) The old site is getting *very* long in the tooth. It demotivates me
> just to look at it.
> 3) The new theme seems ready to go, design wise.
> 4) New site can provide us with some extra PR buzz, independent of the
> Amarok 2.0 release.
> 
> However, some Amarokers oppose this plan; E.g. Lydia and Harald would
> like to wait until the Amarok 2.0 release to roll out the new theme.
> They believe everything has to be perfectly fine tuned (like adapting
> the wiki and forum themes), and that it would create better PR to
> release the new theme along with Amarok 2.0 final (which as we all
> know will take quite some time).
> 
> I've become a bit tired of discussing this on IRC, so I'd like us to
> make a decision here. Please voice your opinion :)

Hum, I has one opinion, I guess...
Pasi did/is doing the mockup, Pasi does/will be doing the ports to all
the software we use, therefore I see no reason why anyone other than
Pasi should decide on this.

Sorry, but that really pisses me off, as we already discussed this on
IRC and explained why we can't do it now, or within the next few
weeks.... there is simply nothing but the mockup right now.

So instead of discussing when _other's_ work has to be released, provide
some feedback to the mockup.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/amarok-devel/attachments/20080410/0e3c93e9/attachment.pgp 


More information about the Amarok-devel mailing list