Engine cleanup--Should we punt GST?

[Seb Ruiz]

i agree, no need to decide now. let's see how phonon-gst goes as well.
seb

On 27/03/07, Paul Cifarelli <paul at cifarelli.net> wrote:
> Was away this week - sorry for the late response.
>
> I'm not particularly attached to the gst10 engine - I picked it up
> because no one else really wanted to, and I thought it would be
> interesting to work on.
>
> I would only say this:  why decide now?  it's not in nearly as bad shape
> as nmm/mas, and I think we're quite a bit away from a release.  Seems
> like we could leave it there and see how much work I get done on it
> between now and release time and then decide.
>
> I will put a higher priority on building video in the helix engine, and
> working on a phonon-helix backend, so I wouldnt say I feel very strongly
> about keeping it.
>
> Paul
> /foreboy
>
> Dan Meltzer wrote:
> > Heya,
> >
> > After discussion on irc today, I finally got to punt the nmm/mas
> > engines.  We are thinking about punting the gst10 engine as well, as
> > there is a well maintained phonon backend for gst.  Foreboy: I'd like
> > to hear your thoughts on that one as you are the maintainer.  It would
> > be nice to get engines down to helix/phonon/void/xine if at all
> > possibile, I am going to email the yauap maintainer next and see about
> > alternatives for it in 2.0.
> >
> > So, Foreboy: any objections to just using the phonon gst10 backend?
> > I'll hold off on punting it until you get time to respond.
> > _______________________________________________
> > Amarok-devel mailing list
> > Amarok-devel at kde.org
> > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/amarok-devel
> >
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Amarok-devel mailing list
> Amarok-devel at kde.org
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/amarok-devel
>
>
>


-- 
http://www.sebruiz.net/