Reviewboard for Plasma Active?

[Marco Martin]

On Tuesday 15 January 2013, Martin Gräßlin wrote:
> On Tuesday 15 January 2013 15:38:22 Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> > On Monday, January 14, 2013 14:11:25 Thomas Pfeiffer wrote:
> > > Maybe this is the point where using Reviewboard may start making sense,
> > > so they can get their patches reviewed in a structured process?
> > 
> > absolutely. question is whether we want/need a unique product for this,
> > or if we just use the plasma group for it. personally, i'd be happy with
> > using the plasma group as much of the changes should be looked at by the
> > same group of folks...
> 
> hasn't there been the idea to merge active more into plasma again? If that
> is still the plan, it should just reuse the Plasma group.

yeah, i thin this is still the plan,, also counting recent discussions on 
plsama-devel about bringing together all "workspace" related projects

-- 
Marco Martin