Reviewboard for Plasma Active?

[Thomas Pfeiffer]

On Tuesday 15 January 2013 17:44:56 Marco Martin wrote:
> On Tuesday 15 January 2013, Martin Gräßlin wrote:
> > On Tuesday 15 January 2013 15:38:22 Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> > > On Monday, January 14, 2013 14:11:25 Thomas Pfeiffer wrote:
> > > > Maybe this is the point where using Reviewboard may start making
> > > > sense,
> > > > so they can get their patches reviewed in a structured process?
> > > 
> > > absolutely. question is whether we want/need a unique product for this,
> > > or if we just use the plasma group for it. personally, i'd be happy with
> > > using the plasma group as much of the changes should be looked at by the
> > > same group of folks...
> > 
> > hasn't there been the idea to merge active more into plasma again? If that
> > is still the plan, it should just reuse the Plasma group.
> 
> yeah, i thin this is still the plan,, also counting recent discussions on
> plsama-devel about bringing together all "workspace" related projects

Okay, so how exactly should we use it? Ask new contributors to request reviews 
for their patches from the Plasma group? What about things the "core team" 
does? Should any of that be reviewed there as well and if so, what kinds of 
things?