Reviewboard for Plasma Active?

[Martin Gräßlin]

On Tuesday 15 January 2013 15:38:22 Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> On Monday, January 14, 2013 14:11:25 Thomas Pfeiffer wrote:
> > Maybe this is the point where using Reviewboard may start making sense,
> > so they can get their patches reviewed in a structured process?
> 
> absolutely. question is whether we want/need a unique product for this, or
> if we just use the plasma group for it. personally, i'd be happy with using
> the plasma group as much of the changes should be looked at by the same
> group of folks...
hasn't there been the idea to merge active more into plasma again? If that is 
still the plan, it should just reuse the Plasma group.

--
Martin Gräßlin
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/active/attachments/20130115/e949c773/attachment.sig>