Reviewboard for Plasma Active?

Tue Jan 15 14:38:22 UTC 2013

On Monday, January 14, 2013 14:11:25 Thomas Pfeiffer wrote:
> Maybe this is the point where using Reviewboard may start making sense,
> so they can get their patches reviewed in a structured process?

absolutely. question is whether we want/need a unique product for this, or if 
we just use the plasma group for it. personally, i'd be happy with using the 
plasma group as much of the changes should be looked at by the same group of 
folks...

-- 
Aaron J. Seigo
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/active/attachments/20130115/3664b6d6/attachment.sig>