Task Proposal: Plasma Media Center

[Sinny Kumari]

Yes, PMC is already usable, it can be used to browse pictures, videos,
music from both the filesystem and PA data models.
Further we've ported the old architecture and now its QML friendly which
allowed us to write the whole UI in QML.

So what I think is same as Marco and Aaron, lets see which of these we find
more usable at the end of this release cycle and we can decide.
Nevertheless, people would be able to install any one of the two,
regardless of the default.

On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 5:35 PM, Marco Martin <notmart at gmail.com> wrote:

> On Friday 20 January 2012, todd rme wrote:
> > >
> > > Hmm... what about Bangarang? Do we need two applications for media
> > > playing or has PMC significant advantages over Bangarang?
> >
> > Bangarang is a standalone app, right?  I would think plasma media
> > center would provide the ability to integrate media functionality
> > directly into containments.  So bangarang would be a more
>
> you can, but by default pmc is a different stand alone plasma shell, so it
> looks like a completely independent app (of which you can put pieces in the
> workspace, but that's another story ;)
>
> technicalities aside, i agree with aaron, developers of both projects
> should
> be able to put effort in it and we'll see what will be the most complete.
>
> i see strenght and weaknesses in both at the moment
>
> --
> Marco Martin
> _______________________________________________
> Active mailing list
> Active at kde.org
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/active
>



-- 
http://www.sinny.in
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/active/attachments/20120122/0b44b026/attachment.html>