[Ktechlab-devel] QMatrix - Random number generation

[P Zoltan]

  Exactly ;)

On Mon, 06 Jul 2009 09:16:26 +0200, Drew Noakes <drewnoakes at yahoo.com.au>  
wrote:

> I think Zoltan was referring to the idea that operator overloading can  
> be confusing for users of the code, and therefore create bugs in calling  
> code even if the operators perform exactly as they were designed to.
>
> Hence the suggestion to refactor the code so that explicit method names  
> were used instead.
>
>
>
> ________________________________
> From: Alan Grimes <agrimes at speakeasy.net>
> To: ktechlab-devel at lists.sourceforge.net
> Sent: Monday, 6 July, 2009 3:04:59
> Subject: Re: [Ktechlab-devel] QMatrix - Random number generation
>
> P Zoltan wrote:
>>   ... and another note on QuickMatrix and QuickVector: the operators
>> defined on these look like a good candidate for sources of bugs. I'd
>> prefer to change the operators to some methods with same functionality  
>> and
>> intiutive names. Opinions?
>
> Could you be more specific?
>
> I'm fairly confident that they aren't actually buggy, at least I'm not
> tracking any bugs in either of those classes at present. The bug I
> mentioned earlier in the week is in the LU decomposition engine.
>