KDESDK to git migration: how many repos for the small developer utils?

[Albert Astals Cid]

El Dimarts, 22 de maig de 2012, a les 19:20:34, Michael Pyne va escriure:
> On Tuesday, May 22, 2012 18:31:12 Friedrich W. H. Kossebau wrote:
> > How should these submodules be split?
> > a) One repo with all?
> > b) "scripts" in a separate repo, rest in one?
> > c) Each an own repo?
> > d) ?
> 
> I would vote for b) as well. It keeps all the scripts together without
> implying that there is a build step required (even the shell CMakeLists.txt
> just installs the scripts directly).
> 
> However Albert had mentioned that changing the module name would be annoying
> from a translation perspective, we'd want to double-check what is necessary
> to merge the different submodules into one/two git modules at the end.

Having more repos is fine, it's just new toplevel modules that is a bit of a 
pain.

Cheers,
  Albert

> 
> Regards,
>  - Michael Pyne