[WikiToLearn] Communication channels

[Riccardo Iaconelli]

Hi Gianluca,

On sabato 21 maggio 2016 15:03:26 CEST Gianluca Rigoletti wrote:
> Speaking about the final docs: we have meta as a domain that keep track of
> everything regarding WikiToLearn. What better place than keeping there all
> the major changes? Doing like so I can easily go to check what are the
> final conventions that the community has made, the latest updates on the
> new features, even if I don't care about all the processes leading to that
> results. I want see how Bob has come solved his problems? I want to see
> what is the status of the ambassadors and the maintainership elections?
> What if I want to check the decisions taken with Mozilla?
> That's why I think post everything on meta is better: it keeps things
> organized

this is something I wholeheartedly agree with, but as I can see in your 
examples, it's all more-or-less final decisions, not proposals :-)

So yeah, I would say we require documentation and all relevant information to 
be present on meta, and maybe we also require references to the archives where 
necessary, but every proposal should be discussed in the most natural form, 
whether in the body text of an e-mail or as a live demo with comments on the 
mailing list.

So yeah, documentation on meta (note: meta is not stone :-) we can have work-
in-progress-but-applying-for-now decisiones), discussion on the mailing list, 
tracking of work-in progress stuff on phabricator. How does that sound?

Bye,
-Riccardo