Task tracking

Davide Valsecchi valsecchi.davide94 at gmail.com
Tue Jan 5 10:23:04 UTC 2016


2016-01-05 9:40 GMT+01:00 Gianluca Rigoletti <gianluca.rigoletti at gmail.com>:

> Hey everyone,
> I agree in every aspect Davide has written.
> Regarding the need of docs, it is a very important tip that could help
> us spare a lot of time. In my opinion
> it could be easier if we have someone that wants to behave like a
> "interface" between the tech guys and the
> wtl users guys and that can check if the documentation is ok to
> complete, readable etc.
>

This role could be useful because a lot of times people outside development
doesn't hear about new improvements or bug fixs, or simply new features
avaiable.



> Furthermore, I think we need phabricator not only for the tech team
> and the improving communication,
> but also for bug/issue tracking. For example, lots of people write on
> telegram channel about bugs in the
> layout of the site. If the bug is not tracked it is lost under the
> huge amount of daily messages.
> So, I will start considering to redirect people on phab when they
> notice something to fix.
>

Ye must definitely use phabricator also as bug traker, I agree.


> What do you think?
>
> Gianluca
>
> 2016-01-04 21:50 GMT+01:00 Russell Greene <russellgreene8 at gmail.com>:
> > I think this would be an improvement. One not I would like to add is that
> > most of the conversations on the telegram channel (and probably the
> hangouts
> > too) should end up being documented in some kind, so people don't have to
> > read through all conversations that they weren't a part of.
> >
> > I think that the goal of the telegram channel/mailing list/hangouts
> should
> > be to have discussions that will end up documented elsewhere, like
> > phabricator if it seems appropriate.
> > approiate
> >
> > -Russell
> >
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Jan 4, 2016 at 12:59 PM Davide Valsecchi
> > <valsecchi.davide94 at gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> Me and other developers noticed that we have to improve the
> communication
> >> between developers doing so many different task in wikitolearn.
> >>
> >> We have already phabricator for task traking. I think that we should use
> >> more this tool, keeping it updated and writing comment on tasks during
> the
> >> work on them (if something notable is encountered).
> >>
> >> In my opinion looking phabricator's board, one should have a clear sight
> >> on w2l development state.
> >> I know that we use a lot telegram channel, and devs hangout are an
> >> essential part of our coordination, but phabricator traking could be a
> big
> >> improvement in the documentation of our work.
> >>
> >> If a task has a problem, we should comment on that and discuss the
> problem
> >> there or on the mailing list (what's better in your opinion?), leaving
> >> useful docs for newer developments and future ones.
> >>
> >> The mailing list should be used for general discuss about w2l
> development
> >> (and task problems) and to announce important things, but I think that
> we
> >> are on the right path here.
> >>
> >> What do you think about?
> >>
> >> Davide
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> WikiToLearn-Tech mailing list
> >> WikiToLearn-Tech at kde.org
> >> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitolearn-tech
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > WikiToLearn-Tech mailing list
> > WikiToLearn-Tech at kde.org
> > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitolearn-tech
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Gianluca
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/wikitolearn-tech/attachments/20160105/125d11f4/attachment.html>


More information about the WikiToLearn-Tech mailing list