[WebKit-devel] KDE WebKit status update [Remix]

[Andrea Diamantini]

On Tuesday 13 October 2009 15:47:01 Dawit A. wrote:
> #2. The use of QNetworkCookieJar does not depend on QNetworkAccessManager.
>  It is actually the vise-versa. QNetworkAccessManager uses
>  QNetworkCookieJar. So why should a re-implementation of such class create
>  the reverse association ?

The same case seems to represent with QNetworkProxy.
Shouldn't we provide a wrapper class for that to let 
{QNetwork,KIO::}AccessManagers share kde proxy settings? 

In rekonq we have a simple implementation of that using KProtocolManager.
I can easily extract it and perform a merge request submit a patch here.

-- 
Andrea Diamantini, adjam
GPG Fingerprint: 57DE 8E32 7D1A 0E16 AA52 59D8 84F9 3ECD DBF9 730F

rekonq project
WEB: http://rekonq.sourceforge.net
IRC: rekonq at freenode

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/webkit-devel/attachments/20091013/0aefba47/attachment.htm