[Uml-devel] Re: [Uml-user] version problem

Jonathan Riddell jr at jriddell.org
Tue Feb 10 11:26:07 UTC 2004


On Tue, Feb 10, 2004 at 12:18:17PM +0000, christian haristouy wrote:
> Sebastian Stein wrote:
> 
> >christian haristouy <christian.haristouy at eikonex.net> [040209 17:58]:
> > 
> >
> >>I've just replaced all "?" and "?" in my file, and I could start him. 
> >>Very great !!!!! But now, I get this error messages : WARNING: 
> >>UMLWidget::setID(int id) called!
> >>...
> >>ERROR: AssociationWidget::loadFromXMI(): cannot find widget for roleB id 
> >>-1
> >>ERROR: couldn't loadFromXMI association widget:0x8939f38, bad XMI file? 
> >>Deleting from umlview.
> >>   
> >>
> >
> >With the latest commit by Brian Thomas this error message also disappears.
> >The only problem left is, that it still needs very long to close Umbrello.
> >
> >Steinchen
> > 
> >
> I'm going to get the last commit on umbrello's server. But with my 
> current version, I haven't noticed that closing umbrello is so long. But 
> 1.1.1 works faster than 1.2 on my computer.
> I have just a little question : when I have an op?ration in a class, I 
> can't modify it. For example, when I have created an op?ration named
> void toto();  on the class Tutu,
> I can't change this function by this for example : void toto( int i) on 
> the class Tutu.
> So, I must delete the old function, and create the new. Is it normal?

The file http://www.reponses.net/conception_appli2.xmi loads fine now
in the CVS versions.

1.1.1 will be faster than 1.2 probably because of the code generation
stuff.  Need to look at being able to turn that off for those who
don't want it and also at keeping the undo stack at a sensible size
(any ideas anyone on how to measure the memory use of the undo stack)?

Is there any chance of donating a screenshot for
http://uml.sourceforge.net/screen.php ?

Thanks

Jonathan Riddell




More information about the umbrello-devel mailing list