[Uml-devel] 2.0 design consideration
Luis De la Parra Blum
lparrab at gmx.net
Sun Feb 23 12:59:15 UTC 2003
On Sunday 23 February 2003 21:48, Jonathan Riddell wrote:
> >
> > It definitely does, since slots&signals are a really great feature of the
> > Qt.
>
> Agreed.
>
> > One question though: How is that kind of stuff implemented in
> > Umbrello 1.x?
>
> You can't, care to implement it?
>
I think andy was talking about adding signals to the UML implementation itself
-->the UMLClass class has a signal "modified(string attribute, string
newValue)"
I dont think he meant adding signals support to the objects of UMLClass ("user
classes"), which would be very nice as well, but has to be implemented, IMHO,
via tags/stereotypes
luis
More information about the umbrello-devel
mailing list