[Uml-devel] 2.0 design consideration

Luis De la Parra Blum lparrab at gmx.net
Sun Feb 23 12:59:15 UTC 2003


On Sunday 23 February 2003 21:48, Jonathan Riddell wrote:
> >
> > It definitely does, since slots&signals are a really great feature of the
> > Qt.
>
> Agreed.
>
> > One question though: How is that kind of stuff implemented in
> > Umbrello 1.x?
>
> You can't, care to implement it?
>

I think andy was talking about adding signals to the UML implementation itself 
-->the UMLClass class has a signal "modified(string attribute, string 
newValue)" 
I dont think he meant adding signals support to the objects of UMLClass ("user 
classes"), which would be very nice as well, but has to be implemented, IMHO, 
via tags/stereotypes

luis





More information about the umbrello-devel mailing list