[Uml-devel] Whats next for associations? UML?

[Luis De la Parra Blum]

On Tuesday 11 February 2003 18:00, Brian Thomas wrote:
> Hi again.
>
> 	Im trying to hammer out my final code for the javacodegenerator fix up and
> I now see that it would be desirable to have multiplicty (that is to say
> UML "notation") more strictly controled by the program. Currently, notation

I thought the exactly the same when I first implemented the generators... but 
for one reason or another I never implemented it =(((
>
> 	Comments?
>
> 														=b.t.

sounds really good.

luis