[Uml-devel] Oops. Question on Rolename placement in diagrams.

[Andrew Sutton]

On Tuesday 11 February 2003 12:44 pm, Brian Thomas wrote:
> Crud.
>
> 	Im afraid I might have transposed the rolenames on the diagrams. My
> understanding of UML layout is that for two classes in association you
> have:
>
>
> 	Where "roleA" is the role that ClassA plays within CLASS B and viceversa.
> Can someone confirm or not? IF this is the desired layout of classes in
> association, then I have reversed it, and can put out a patch.
>

i'm pretty sure that that's right - if i understood what i read correctly.

andy