[Uml-devel] [ uml-Feature Requests-626891 ] messages for operations in super classes

[Jonathan Riddell]

> > (I have no idea if this can be implemented since it requires looking at the
> > associations in other diagrams.)

> BUT (and that's a *big* BUT) Associations are NOT part of the diagrams, but of
> the models.
> A Class inherits from another class, and a class is an agregate of another
> class.. you can show this in a diagram or not, but that doesnt change
> anything in the model.
>
> the problem is that the code now is *completly* wrong here. The associations
> are implemented as if they were valid only for one diagram, but this is not
> the case.

What happens if you have two diagrams, one which shows a class
implementing from one class and another diagram showing the same class
implementing from a different class?

But you're probably right, so you know where the feature tracker is :)

Jonathan Riddell