[Uml-devel] report

[Jonathan Riddell]

> > Hang on a minute, if != isn't defined the compiler knows to make it
> > equivalent to ! and ==.  I think.
>
> maybe your compiler does know how to make a != out of a == and a !, by
> changing y != z to !(y==z) behind the scenes, but mine doesn't.
>
> I've heard RH uses gcc 3.0, and SuSE is using 2.95.... so maybe that's why.
> But Paul didnt get that error either, and I think he was on debian... do you
> know what compiler they're using??  (just wondering if it's a compiler
> version thing, or if that's a red hat problem)

This week I have been mostly using Debian and I have the choice of either.
GCC 3 doesn't indeed not work with an implied != which GCC 2 does.  I've
changed the section I was editing back to ! and ==.

Jonathan Riddell