2.0 branch

Ralf Engels ralf-engels at gmx.de
Mon Feb 23 22:04:11 CET 2009

I am wondering,
has something been done for the 2.0 branch?

Could we do something soon. I have two weeks of time on my hands and I
would do something for taglib.

Actually when I have some time there is a big amount that I can get done
but only if nothing stops me.

So a 2.0 branch where I could fiddle around would be most welcome.


> Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 10:52:41 -0500
> From: Jason Voegele <jason at jvoegele.com>
> Subject: Re: Support "album artist" and "artist sort" in TagLib::Tag
> 	interface?
> To: taglib-devel at kde.org
> Cc: Ben K <mrmrpotatohead at gmail.com>
> Message-ID: <200902121052.46867.jason at jvoegele.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15"
> On Tuesday 10 February 2009 06:44:55 pm Ben K wrote:
> > I'd be happy to help with implementation of this feature. I've been looking
> > at how to incorporate AlbumArtist into Amarok 2.0 and this TagLib
> > functionality would be very useful.
> >
> > I'm reasonably experienced with coding in C and C#, having used them for
> > uni and work respectively. I am getting more familiar with C++ as I explore
> > Amarok2. Let me know how I can help TagLib.
> I'm not an Amarok or TagLib developer, but I'd say an important first step is 
> to get the ball rolling on TagLib 2.0.  Previous messages in this thread have 
> indicated that many 2.0 enhancements are ready and are just waiting to be 
> committed.  If that's true, I'd like to cast my vote for committing them now.  
> If it is not a good time to do this for the TagLib mainline, then perhaps an 
> experimental 2.0 branch could be set up so that others could get involved with 
> 2.0 development?  I also would be willing to help evolve TagLib into the next 
> generation, whether it is with C++ development or API design discussions.

More information about the taglib-devel mailing list