The speedy commit of patches...

[Ismail Dönmez]

On Friday 08 June 2007 01:30:23 Michael wrote:
> Michael Pyne wrote:
> > [..]
> >
> > If it works I'll commit it when I get home tomorrow if Scott doesn't beat
> > me to it.
> >
> > Regards,
> >  - Michael Pyne
> >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> No offense, I'm just curious. Is there some priority model on what gets
> commited quick and what has to have more review?
>
> I am asking because some people post patches that wait for months while
> other patches land within days. Among them but not limited to just
> those, I am thinking of the three patches that Stephen F. Booth has
> posted on the 27th of May, those looked like issues that may affect a
> lot of users of TagLib, not only at compile time. And I believe I've
> seen more patches posted to the KDE bug system that are still in
> 'unconfirmed' status.
>
> Where is the best place to post patches? Is there something the creators
> of patches should now or do to speed up the commit?

If you open a bug on bugs.kde.org and attach the patch, at least it can be 
tracked easily.

Regards,
ismail

-- 
Perfect is the enemy of good
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 827 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
Url : http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/taglib-devel/attachments/20070608/ab9acfa9/attachment.pgp