order of plugins

[Thomas Friedrichsmeier]

Hi!

On Wed, 09 Mar 2016 18:08:51 +0100
meik michalke <meik.michalke at uni-duesseldorf.de> wrote:
> when RKWard detects a new plugin, it is added at the top of all
> existing plugins.

I don't think that is the case? It is true that pluginmaps that you add
_via the dialog_, manually, are often added to the top. Here the
possibly non-obvious logic is to add at the currently selected index
(if any). I could change that to always bottom, easily.

But perhaps you are talking about something entirely different?

> wouldn't it be better to append it instead? adding
> stuff before even the basic menu structure is loaded can lead to
> strange results.

Of course the best practice to avoid the worst mis-placements is to
use <require map="rkward::menu"/> in your pluginmap (not sure the
documentation mentions that, somewhere, or in a place where you'd be
likely to find that bit...).

Regards
Thomas
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/rkward-devel/attachments/20160310/04357cd7/attachment.sig>