[rkward-devel] power analysis plugin

[Thomas Friedrichsmeier]

On Saturday 11 October 2014 16:56:39 meik michalke wrote:
> well, in fact there is no rk.XML.option() yet ;-) all options are directly
> defined by rk.XML.radio() as a list. but if one needs the possibility of
> getting an ID from an option, adding rk.XML.option() seems to be inevitable.
> i don't se another way to clearly specify which option you mean, except
> directly naming the ID yourself.

Oh, I wasn't paying attention. Well, I'm not sure about the implications. Few 
options will ever need an id, and those that don't need one, should not be 
given one (to avoid name clashes, and for better performance). And inside one 
radio/dropdown, the number of id'ed options will certainly be limited, anyway. 
Thus, perhaps, naming an id manually, is the way to go. I.e rk.XML.radio() 
could accept options like this:

list ("First option"=c (val="1"), "Second option"=c (val="2", chk=TRUE), 
"Optional option"=c (val="3", id="three"))

Regards
Thomas
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/rkward-devel/attachments/20141011/d3411b99/attachment.sig>