New Framework Review: KDAV

Volker Krause vkrause at
Sun Feb 16 09:29:42 GMT 2020

On Saturday, 15 February 2020 11:42:57 CET Andreas Cord-Landwehr wrote:
> Hi, sorry for this very late mail, missed the call for reviews...
> Would it be possible to do some license clarifications before moving kdav
> into the frameworks section?
> In mostly all files it is not clear if the LGPL or the GPL is meant (stating
> "GNU Library General Public License" and referring to the GPL text at the
> end of the statement). This license statement is used for all files except
> autotests/fakesever.cpp and autotests/fakeserver.h.
> Luckily, from the copyright statements there are only 3 copyright holders:
> Tobias, Sandro and Gregory. I put all 3 into CC.
> @Tobias, Sandro, Gregory: Can you clarify that the code you are holding
> copyright about in this repository is licensed according to
> LGPL-2.0-or-later?

Thanks for checking!

We have relicensing approval to LGPL for those three already in https:// (thread continues 
into the next month), so it's probably something I messed up while executing 
the relicensing :)

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 195 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <>

More information about the release-team mailing list