Future frameworks releases

Christian Mollekopf chrigi_1 at fastmail.fm
Tue Jun 9 08:39:58 UTC 2015

On Monday 08 June 2015 11:21:56 Benjamin Reed wrote:
> On 6/8/15 11:02 AM, Eric Hameleers wrote:
> > The only sane way forward is that every Frameworks release contains
> > all Frameworks tarballs, regardless of updates since the previous
> > public release. Every Framework should adhere to the overall version
> > number.
> Yeah, this proposal makes no sense to me.  If you want to individually
> manage a library with an independent numbering scheme, then shouldn't it
> be a separate/external project?  The whole point of the "framework" is
> to provide a monolithic thing that has everything you need.

If that's the point of frameworks, being that monolithic thing, then indeed 
you are right. But I really hope it isn't.

More information about the release-team mailing list