Fwd: KDE Frameworks Release Cycle

Martin Gräßlin mgraesslin at kde.org
Wed Apr 30 11:23:18 UTC 2014

On Wednesday 30 April 2014 12:33:06 Àlex Fiestas wrote:
> We are all on the same situation and we have to make the best of it. We
> believe that e can do best if we focus on master and make sure master rocks,
> it has no regressions etc.

Obviously, if we are able to increase the quality of overall frameworks by a 
more suited development model, the number of bugs goes down and the number of 
fixes which need to be backported will go down. Which might end this 
discussion as a non-issue.

At least for the frameworks I maintain, I do hope that we will never have to 
do bug fixes. And that's kind of the case right now already - kwindowsystem 
4.x last saw a bug fix in 2012.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/release-team/attachments/20140430/d4e86922/attachment.sig>

More information about the release-team mailing list