Review Request 111949: Backup ResourceListGenerator: Do not only count files with tags

[David Edmundson]

> On Aug. 8, 2013, 9:06 p.m., Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> > I can confirm that the new test fails without the patch and works with it. I can't assess the correctness of the code itself since my nepomuk-foo ? 0
> > 
> > It'd be cool if someone else from nepomuk-land can try to review. If not I'll guess we'll have to trust Vishesh and commit it :-)

I can vouch that the patch looks sensible and will do what Vishesh says.
Ship it from me.


- David


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/111949/#review37385
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Aug. 8, 2013, 7:04 p.m., Vishesh Handa wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/111949/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Aug. 8, 2013, 7:04 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Nepomuk and Release Team.
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
>     Only files with tags used to be backed up. If a file had only a rating
>     or a comment then its information would not be backed up.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   autotests/test/backuptests.cpp 7284dd6 
>   services/storage/backup/resourcelistgenerator.cpp 059bfa7 
> 
> Diff: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/111949/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Tested by manually backing up a number of times.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Vishesh Handa
> 
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/release-team/attachments/20130808/8443d182/attachment-0001.html>