Akonadi-Nepomuk Feeder Improvements

[Christian Mollekopf]

On Friday 28 December 2012 18.58:55 laurent Montel wrote:
> Perhaps you can create a review on  https://git.reviewboard.kde.org it's
> more easy to see diff and comment.
> 

https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/107989/

Cheers,
Christian

> Regards.
> 
> Le jeudi 27 décembre 2012 23:44:01 Albert Astals Cid a écrit :
> > Volker, Vishesh, David, Laurent, can any of you guys comment on the code
> > Christian is asking to be in RC2?
> > 
> > Cheers,
> > 
> >   Albert
> > 
> > El Dijous, 27 de desembre de 2012, a les 18:56:11, Christian Mollekopf va
> > 
> > escriure:
> > > On Thursday 27 December 2012 18.44:53 Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> > > > El Dijous, 27 de desembre de 2012, a les 18:14:51, Christian Mollekopf
> > > > va
> > > > 
> > > > escriure:
> > > > > On Wednesday 26 December 2012 22.28:55 Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> > > > > > El Dimecres, 26 de desembre de 2012, a les 17:00:43, Christian
> > > > > > Mollekopf
> > > > > > va
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > escriure:
> > > > > > > Hey,
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > I have a set of patches for the akonadi-nepomuk feeder
> > > > > > > containing
> > > > > > > massive
> > > > > > > performance improvements but also fairly intrusive changes how
> > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > feeders
> > > > > > > work, as the concept used so far didn't really work out so well
> > > > > > > for
> > > > > > > us,
> > > > > > > resulting in the nepomuk getting overloaded frequently.
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > As the feeders so far are IMO just broken, I think we can
> > > > > > > consider
> > > > > > > this
> > > > > > > a
> > > > > > > bugfix and should get it into 4.10.
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > More information can be found in recent kde-pim archives:
> > > > > > > http://lists.kde.org/?l=kde-pim&m=135653672101531&w=2
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > The code is here:
> > > > > > > http://quickgit.kde.org/?p=clones%2Fkdepim-
> > > > > > > runtime%2Fcmollekopf%2FpimRuntimeClone.git&a=shortlog&h=c2ca9156
> > > > > > > 69
> > > > > > > 53
> > > > > > > c5
> > > > > > > 7a
> > > > > > > f1
> > > > > > > 19 634f65b5bd73bac7e7fa
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > So if you're ok with that, I'll commit that in the coming days
> > > > > > > to
> > > > > > > 4.10.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Who's the maintainer of that code? Is it you? I'd like the
> > > > > > non-silent
> > > > > > agreement of that person before we further discuss if we want this
> > > > > > that
> > > > > > late in the game.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Yes that's me. I've written most of the new code, initial
> > > > > development
> > > > > has
> > > > > been mostly done by Volker, but he hasn't been involved much in the
> > > > > last
> > > > > year.
> > > > 
> > > > Well, you are not really an impartial person in this (you wrote the
> > > > code,
> > > > so obviously you think it's better), it'd be cool to have someone that
> > > > has knowledge to give an assesment over the risks/benefits this late
> > > > change would give us
> > > 
> > > Indeed.
> > > 
> > > > http://techbase.kde.org/Projects/Release_Team lists Allen as the
> > > > kdepim
> > > > release coordinator, Allen can you do that assesment or find someone
> > > > to
> > > > do
> > > > it?
> > > 
> > > The people with the most knowledge about it are probably Volker and
> > > Vishesh. David Faure and Laurent also read some of the code I think.
> > > 
> > > I'd be happy to discuss/explain the problems and solutions with anyone
> > > interested, just let me know.
> > > 
> > > Cheers,
> > > Christian
> > > 
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > release-team mailing list
> > > release-team at kde.org
> > > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team