Question about git repository layout + releases

[Dominik Haumann]

On Thursday, 21. October 2010, Eike Hein wrote:
> On 10/21/2010 07:08 PM, Dominik Haumann wrote:
> > This is not entirely correct: True, we want to move the git repo to
> > KDE's git infrastructure. Christoph could still merge all changes back
> > to svn (just like he does now); this is no issue. Hence, no problem
> > for the release cycle.
> 
> Well, that's not what Christoph wrote in the bug report, nor
> in his mail to this list:
> 
> "No my question: Whereas the git stuff is no problem itself, is it then
> still
> possible to have the kate repo auto-released with KDE SC like atm?"

sorry, you're right, of course.

> If that's not on the agenda (for now), then just moving the repo
> is no problem from the sysadmin side.
> 
> Unless release-team objects to having SC stuff on git.kde.org until
> the modules migrate. But I'd advise against such an objection because
> the consequence would be that you guys just continue to use Gitorious,
> even without kde-developers, and that sort of fragmentation doesn't
> help anyone.

Yes, so basically this were two questions in one :)

Greetings,
Dominik