[PATCH] Making Soprano optional (again) in kdelibs
Aaron J. Seigo
aseigo at kde.org
Sun Jan 3 02:54:07 CET 2010
On January 1, 2010, Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> IMHO asking the packagers to split kdelibs is too much, if we want a split
> kdelibs is something we should do.
i don't think we want to split up kdelibs as that just makes development
itself more annoying/difficult. it seems more like something that some
packagers want to limit the size of dependencies. we could perhaps offer
guidelines or even something in the build system that makes it more evident
what the library layering is in kdelibs, though. i mean, you can certainly put
libplasma in its own package without problem if you wanted to. doesn't require
changes in kdelibs (other than touching plasma/CMakeLists.tx), but beyond that
i think this is really a packaging decision issue.
--
Aaron J. Seigo
humru othro a kohnu se
GPG Fingerprint: 8B8B 2209 0C6F 7C47 B1EA EE75 D6B7 2EB1 A7F1 DB43
KDE core developer sponsored by Qt Development Frameworks
More information about the release-team
mailing list