getting rid of kde-l10n

[Albert Astals Cid]

A Dimarts, 2 de febrer de 2010, Helio Chissini de Castro va escriure:
> On Tuesday 02 February 2010 17:41:43 Rex Dieter wrote:
> > Hear me out. :)
> >
> > I'm not proposing anything yet, but would like to hear about the
> > pros/cons of
> > 1.  status quo: shipping translations separately to software
> >
> > 2.  shipping translations alonside (ie, in the same release tarballs)
> > the software.
> >
> > How hard would it be to work toward something closer to 2 for KDE SC?
> >
> > -- Rex
> 
> For me i see only one clear reason where this situation can provide some
> benefits, if we go to git path to have per app repository.
> Otherwise, change current structure is bad bad idea, nothing matter
>  pros/cons, is just change a secular ( yes, comes from last one  :-)
>  process.
> So i would advise to raise this question for l10n team and scm discussion.

Moving the po files to the repository of each of the apps is the worst mistake 
you could make. Gnome had to write a whole web app just to overcome this 
problem in their repo.

Albert

> 
> []'s
>