getting rid of kde-l10n
Rex Dieter
rdieter at math.unl.edu
Tue Feb 2 23:00:57 CET 2010
On 02/02/2010 03:45 PM, Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> A Dimarts, 2 de febrer de 2010, Rex Dieter va escriure:
>> Hear me out. :)
>>
>> I'm not proposing anything yet, but would like to hear about the
>> pros/cons of
>> 1. status quo: shipping translations separately to software
>>
>> 2. shipping translations alonside (ie, in the same release tarballs)
>> the software.
>>
>> How hard would it be to work toward something closer to 2 for KDE SC?
>
> What would be the benefit?
I know it's been this way for like forever. Just wondering what kinds
of attachments there are, and pros/cons of each approach.
Honestly, part of this comes from my being a distro packager, but
keeping these separate is ... a bit painful(1). Also, fedora's release
team keeps asking my why kde keeps translations separate, and I honestly
don't have a good answer for them.
Seems only the SC portions keep things separate, I mean extragear
releases bundle software/translations together, so it's not like it's
something new or different.
-- Rex
(1) releases that kept software/translations bundled together makes
their packaging simpler, imo.
More information about the release-team
mailing list