4.3.5?

[Michael Pyne]

On Monday 28 December 2009 14:06:49 Sebastian Kügler wrote:
> On Sunday 27 December 2009 15:08:59 Allen Winter wrote:
> > > > Did devels effectively backport to make it worth a new release?
> > >
> > > No, but of course it could be done the other way round: announce 4.3.5,
> > > then  we'll backport. Although I'd kind of hate spending time
> > > backporting all the stuff instead of fixing more bugs for 4.4.0...
> >
> > Apparently there's no strong desire for a 4.3.5.
> > So let's leave it up to the folks who do the actual release work.
> >
> > Dirk? Sebas??
> 
> I don't mind doing it. :)
> 
> If other feel it's not worth it, that's also fine with me.

JuK has a crash-on-shutdown fix in branch which could make a 4.3.5 worthwhile 
for kdemultimedia at least.

But on the other hand that fix was put in because of some packagers prodding 
me so I'd expect that fix to have been picked up downstream anyways. ;)

Regards,
 - Michael Pyne
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
Url : http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/release-team/attachments/20091228/c651520c/attachment.sig