KDE 4.1.3 (try #1) uploaded

Patrick Spendrin ps_ml at gmx.de
Sat Nov 1 12:30:03 CET 2008


nihui schrieb:
> On Friday 31 October 2008 04:37:59 Dirk Mueller wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> just finished uploading the first try of the KDE 4.1.3 tarballs. I've not
>> tested them much yet. Please give me feedback about compile issues (I see
>> one in dashboard with kdenetwork, I'll try to replicate and fix that one)
>> or other show stopper bugs.
>>
>> Planned announcement time is next week wednesday.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Dirk
> 
> hi, hmm.
> I found that KDE 4.1.3 wouldn't be compiled with gcc < 4.1.2.
> The errors were like such errors in BUG #162084.
> [#quoted: gcc < 4.1.2 does not follow the C++ standard for nested classes.]
> 
> -------->8-------->8-------->8-------->8-------->8-------->8-------->8--------
>> [ 56%] Building CXX object kio/CMakeFiles/kio.dir/kio/klimitediodevice.o
>> kdelibs-4.1.3/kio/kio/kdirlister.cpp: In member function `void 
> KDirListerCache::DirectoryData::moveListersWithoutCachedItemsJob()':
>> kdelibs-4.1.3/kio/kio/kdirlister.h:636: error: `KDirLister:rivate* const 
> KDirLister::d' is private
>> kdelibs-4.1.3/kio/kio/kdirlister.cpp:2527: error: within this context
> -------->8-------->8-------->8-------->8-------->8-------->8-------->8--------
> 
> Besides, another kind of error occurred when I compiled it with gcc 3.x (or 
> maybe gcc 4.3.1 too?)
> 
> -------->8-------->8-------->8-------->8-------->8-------->8-------->8--------
>> kdelibs-4.1.3/nepomuk/core/resourcefiltermodel.cpp:181:   instantiated from 
> here
>> /usr/lib/qt4/include/QtCore/qhash.h:854: error: call of overloaded 
> `qHash(const QUrl&)' is ambiguous
>> kdelibs-4.1.3/nepomuk/core/resourcefiltermodel.cpp:52: note: candidates are: 
> uint qHash(const Soprano::Node&)
>> kdelibs-4.1.3/nepomuk/core/resourcefiltermodel.cpp:46: note:                 
> uint Soprano::qHash(const Soprano::Node&)
> -------->8-------->8-------->8-------->8-------->8-------->8-------->8--------
> 
> As these errors are only present in old gcc environment, I don't think devs 
> must fix them. We can update the build requirements page on techbase instead.
Nope, those should be fixed, but we don't need to change the tarball.
Windows will break on those two errors but I already fixed them locally.
> 
> nihui
regards,
Patrick
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Kde-packager mailing list
> Kde-packager at kde.org
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-packager


-- 
web:                 http://windows.kde.org
mailing list:        kde-windows at kde.org
irc:                 #kde-windows (irc.freenode.net)


More information about the release-team mailing list