Pre-approved Languages

[Aaron J. Seigo]

On Sunday 30 March 2008, Andreas Pakulat wrote:
> But even though both bindings are in quite good shape - AFAIK and both
> languages should be pre-approved.

+1 for python and ruby.

the fact that they've been around for some years now and apps built with them 
work well gives me enough confidence to have included-with-KDE-releases apps 
rely on them.

i agree with Andreas that there is room for improvement on both sets of 
bindings. i think these improvement will happen quicker if they actually get 
used more, just like how our libs improve much more rapidly and in useful 
directions when they get real world use.

-- 
Aaron J. Seigo
humru othro a kohnu se
GPG Fingerprint: 8B8B 2209 0C6F 7C47 B1EA  EE75 D6B7 2EB1 A7F1 DB43

KDE core developer sponsored by Trolltech
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 194 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
Url : http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/release-team/attachments/20080330/1cb7abcc/attachment.pgp