Konqueror questions.

[Aaron J. Seigo]

On Thursday 27 September 2007, Allen Winter wrote:
> On Tuesday 25 September 2007 11:50:04 am Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> > and as i said in my first email, i thought we'd already achieved
> > consensus that said "running kde3 kdepim apps is fine for 4.0, with the
> > goal of having kde4 pim apps ready for prime time in 4.1"? so i'm seeing
> > a slippage here in our consensus that seems to be endangering our ability
> > to release in a suitable time frame.
>
> We did.
> I'm only arguing for a tweak to that plan: whereby we decide on a few of
> our more famous, critical apps (eg. konq, dolphin, kmail, kate) that we
> ensure are functional before we release 4.0.0.  And when I say "functional"
>  I don't mean 100% bug-free.  But the app can be used on a daily basis
> without pulling out all your hair.

i agree with this; where we perhaps differ is that i don't think kmail is one 
of the apps we should put into this list for 4.0.

in fact, kmail is the only one on the list above (given current state and the 
people working on them) that i think is not likely to be realistic.

> kmail is useless right now, but I'm hoping the KDAB army comes to the
> rescue soon.

yes, that would be awesome. however, i don't think this should hold up 4.0. we 
knew that it not making 4.0 was a likeliehood for more than a year now, 
so ... =) of course, if KDAB or $SOMEONE steps up and gets kmail rockin' for 
4.0, huzzah! but marking it as a "showstopper" is what was concerning to me.

-- 
Aaron J. Seigo
humru othro a kohnu se
GPG Fingerprint: 8B8B 2209 0C6F 7C47 B1EA  EE75 D6B7 2EB1 A7F1 DB43

KDE core developer sponsored by Trolltech
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/release-team/attachments/20070927/500630ca/attachment.pgp