annemarie.mahfouf at free.fr
Tue May 29 09:54:53 CEST 2007
Hi Allen, hi all,
I am interested for kdeedu. Indeed a good way to polish the programs before a
Ideally, I even would like to go further and do a QA audit for kdeedu apps
(Jason explained what it is
in order to tackle the most evident (but sometimes unseen) bugs.
On Tuesday 29 May 2007 00:00:42 Allen Winter wrote:
> Remember the Quality Checks initiative ?
> I think we should restart such an effort, but this time on TechBase.
> Each module could have a page on TechBase with a matrix.
> rows of the matrix have the applications
> columns of the matrix have the stuff to check.
> The old initiative checked for:
> Ported to Qt4/KDE4
> KIOSK aware
> Network transparent (uses KIO)
> Checked by the usability team
> No usability issues
> No HIG issues
> Follows coding conventions
> Up to date documentation
> Developer (doxygen) documentation
> Uses KConfigXT
> Uses .ui files
> Uses XMLGUI
> Optimized startup code
> No icon problems
> In any event, danimo will be removing the old quality-check
> stuff from developer.kde.org soon. I volunteer to create
> a prototype checklist matrix for kdepim if there is interest.
>  http://developer.kde.org/quality-check/results.php
More information about the release-team