Release Time Shift
Cornelius Schumacher
schumacher at kde.org
Fri Mar 16 17:04:40 CET 2007
On Friday 16 March 2007 16:37, Allen Winter wrote:
>
> Would there be any major objections to shifting the entire plan forward
> by 1 month?
>
> Reasons:
> 1) The subsystem freeze on 1 April is only 2 weeks from now and we
> still haven't finalized the roadmap.
Which subsystems do you expect to be added to kdelibs which won't make it for
April 1, but will be able to make it a month later?
> 2) I was chatting with some of the core devs this morning, and there is
> still *lots* to-do in kdelibs. (eg, no gui in core, no qt3support in
> kdeui+kio; all BC-related, so it can't be done later)
These all sound not like they would be affected by the subsystem freeze and to
the kdelibs soft API freeze there still is quite some time.
> 3) more time to arrange a kdelibs dev meeting
As this should be a small meeting to be efficient, I don't think we need too
much time in advance. In fact for example piggying back on the meeting Simon
mentioned might be easier than to arrange something new a month later.
> So, 1 May would be the subsystem freeze, with 1 month added onto
> all the other milestones.
Wouldn't it be better to try to go with the aggressive schedule and move
things later in case we really aren't able to make it?
--
Cornelius Schumacher <schumacher at kde.org>
More information about the release-team
mailing list