KCalc's Future

[Tom Albers]

Op Saturday 8 December 2007 20:40 schreef u:
> I'm not sure there is a 
> strong need for a maintainer. Its got well below the average amount of 
> bugs (22)

We are aming for a maintainer for each application. See for example the gmp-issue, that still needs to be resolved. If there is no maintainer for an application it should be removed when problems arise. In that case i much prefer an actively maintained SpeedCrunch above KCalc.

Toma