Fwd: [Kde-pim] Request to exclude KMail from the KDE 4.0 release
sebas at kde.org
Fri Dec 7 16:48:38 CET 2007
On Friday 07 December 2007 16:15:01 Cornelius Schumacher wrote:
> On Friday 07 December 2007, Sebastian Kuegler wrote:
> > On Friday 07 December 2007 00:49:08 Allen Winter wrote:
> > > Yes, KMail is really as bad as indicated in the enclosed message.
> > > And so are many of the KDEPIM apps.
> > That matches what Mirko of KDAB told me. He also said that it should be
> > fine by April.
> "should be fine" is always a disturbing statement ;-)
> > One question (therefore CC: Thiago), what is affected by the missing SSL
> > support? Or did that arrive in the meantime?
> As far as I know file upload in Konqueror is affected as well.
> > > Anyway... how to proceed? Simply leave out the kdepim -4.0.0 tarball?
> > Yes. Bad luck, but PIM3 works fine in the meantime.
> I guess we shouldn't take a decision until just before the RC2 release.
> Let's give people a chance to fix it. It's still a couple of weeks. Maybe
> somebody finds back into the project over the holidays ;-)
It *is* just before the -rc2 release. Tagging has in fact already been done
last week (remember the freeze!), so it's even too latte removing it
http://www.kde.org | http://vizZzion.org | GPG Key ID: 9119 0EF9
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 477 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
Url : http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/release-team/attachments/20071207/bf219fbd/attachment.pgp
More information about the release-team