Fwd: [Kde-pim] Request to exclude KMail from the KDE 4.0 release

[Sebastian Kuegler]

On Friday 07 December 2007 16:15:01 Cornelius Schumacher wrote:
> On Friday 07 December 2007, Sebastian Kuegler wrote:
> > On Friday 07 December 2007 00:49:08 Allen Winter wrote:
> > > Yes, KMail is really as bad as indicated in the enclosed message.
> > > And so are many of the KDEPIM apps.
> >
> > That matches what Mirko of KDAB told me. He also said that it should be
> > fine by April.
>
> "should be fine" is always a disturbing statement ;-)
>
> > One question (therefore CC: Thiago), what is affected by the missing SSL
> > support? Or did that arrive in the meantime?
>
> As far as I know file upload in Konqueror is affected as well.

Urgh.

> > > Anyway... how to proceed?  Simply leave out the kdepim -4.0.0 tarball?
> >
> > Yes. Bad luck, but PIM3 works fine in the meantime.
>
> I guess we shouldn't take a decision until just before the RC2 release.
> Let's give people a chance to fix it. It's still a couple of weeks. Maybe
> somebody finds back into the project over the holidays ;-)

It *is* just before the -rc2 release. Tagging has in fact already been done 
last week (remember the freeze!), so it's even too latte removing it 
for -rc2.
-- 
sebas

 http://www.kde.org | http://vizZzion.org |  GPG Key ID: 9119 0EF9 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 477 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
Url : http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/release-team/attachments/20071207/bf219fbd/attachment.pgp