[rekonq] Review Request: Add default search engine to rekonq

Shang Yuanchun idealities at gmail.com
Wed Apr 4 11:28:21 UTC 2012



> On April 4, 2012, 10:42 a.m., Marc Deop wrote:
> > I think this was discussed in the irc channel (#rekonq) and we decided we could not set a particular search engine to be the default. Why do you set it to be "Google" and not "Bing"? (just an example). A warning was added some time ago and I think it's enough.

Yes, i agree with you. Sorry for posting this before i dicussing it in irc.


- Shang


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/104474/#review12157
-----------------------------------------------------------


On April 3, 2012, 7:15 a.m., Shang Yuanchun wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/104474/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated April 3, 2012, 7:15 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for rekonq.
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Add a default search engine for rekonq.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/opensearch/searchengine.cpp aef06a7 
>   src/rekonq.kcfg 1675c55 
> 
> Diff: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/104474/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> It has been tested.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Shang Yuanchun
> 
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/rekonq/attachments/20120404/8f952b00/attachment.html>


More information about the rekonq mailing list