[rekonq] Re: Help on debugging rekonq

[Andrea Diamantini]

On Tuesday 18 January 2011 14:49:05 Pierre Rossi wrote:
 
> Actually, I believe it was a very different issue, since the backtraces are
> totally different:
> http://paste.kde.org/~shadeslayer/2488/

I think that, too.
 
> And that's not quite the conclusion I drew of this conversation, but my
> attention was drawn towards the fact that we were using QWeakPointer
> without a QSharedPointer, which seemed weird at first.
> In any case, for those who are curious, here's where the discussion led:
> 
> http://doc.trolltech.com/latest/qweakpointer.html#tracking-qobject
> 
> and the commit that made this possible:
> http://qt.gitorious.org/qt/qt/commit/021a116d48a1df3624ad2221a418f1585f7ec4
> f8

I started using QWeakPointer instead of QPointer because of this: 
http://doc.trolltech.com/latest/qweakpointer.html#details

> Both are a bit of a mystery to me, but if you guys have a way of
> reproducing either of those crashes, I'm willing to investigate.

While I have a couple of half-ideas about the crash Rohan pointed out, I 
perfectly know how to reproduce my bug: just click on the set bookmark icon on 
the urlbar. 
I did not explained it before to have informations about how you treat such  
backtraces ;)

> Cheers,
> --
> Pierre

Cheers,
-- 
Andrea Diamantini, adjam
GPG Fingerprint: 57DE 8E32 7D1A 0E16 AA52 59D8 84F9 3ECD DBF9 730F

rekonq project
WEB: http://rekonq.kde.org
IRC: rekonq at freenode
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/rekonq/attachments/20110118/16973d40/attachment.htm