[rekonq] Re: Using git for review

[Andrea Diamantini]

On Tuesday 04 January 2011 17:24:48 Pierre Rossi wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 14:30, Benjamin Poulain
>
> > Can we consider moving back to gitorious? (or any system alike you
> > prefer) and just mirror git.kde.org?

No :(

While I'm one of the promoters of the discussion in k-c-d and it's perfectly 
clear to me that gitorious works really better than reviewboard, considering 
our workflow, I also am aware that we ARE a KDE project and I don't want to 
minimize the HUGE work done by our sysadmins implementing the git 
infrastructure.
the gitolite + cgit choice is really good and while the reviewboard one is not 
so good as the others, I think we should work INSIDE the community to fix and 
improve the things we don't like and/or would better.

I also think that, given a group of developers, let's say the "rekonq group", 
it should not be super hard implementing a system to automagically push/update 
a remote clone on reviewboard, adding in the description the name of the 
remote branch, so that the reviewer can (again, automagically) pull it.

Last think I miss from gitorious is the ability for the reviewer to close the 
submitted/rejected requests. There are around 5 now in our reviewboard.

This will improve our current workflow, IMHO at the level of the gitorious 
times, and will let us continue being an "innovative" group in the KDE 
community.

Regards, 
-- 
Andrea Diamantini, adjam
GPG Fingerprint: 57DE 8E32 7D1A 0E16 AA52 59D8 84F9 3ECD DBF9 730F

rekonq project
WEB: http://rekonq.kde.org
IRC: rekonq at freenode
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/rekonq/attachments/20110105/3b827b55/attachment-0001.htm