[rekonq] bug #237390

Nikhil Marathe nsm.nikhil at gmail.com
Sat Jun 5 08:04:38 CEST 2010


Hi Mathias,

That looks like a good patch to me. A few minor annoyances

At lines 10, 125, 138, could you please put each argument on a
separate line rather than extending the line so much.

line 218, please add a comment explaining why you are removing the slash.

And could you give a high level overview of what you mean by
"UrlResolver::privilegedItem it wasn't needed anyway and I found a
good
workaround for that". That would make a good commit message to so that
someone looking at the code could get a good idea of why it is the way
it is.

Regards,
Nikhil

On 6/4/10, Mathias Kraus <k.hias at gmx.de> wrote:
> hi,
>
> I'm affected with bug #237390 [1], so I decided to have a look at it.
> attached is a bookmark file with 10000 entries. if you use it with the
> current
> rekonq, don't type anything in the urlbar. it will freeze and take very long
> to respond again.
> with the attached patch, you get almost immediately the completion list.
> basically I extendet UrlSearchItem and replaced the KUrl with a QString,
> because that had a negative effect to performance. beside
> UrlResolver::privilegedItem it wasn't needed anyway and I found a good
> workaround for that. the completion now also works for titles, not only for
> urls.
> at the moment the startup speed is negatively affected with many bookmarks,
> but as rekonq is unusable with that many bookmarks, this shouldn't matter at
> the moment. I don't really know what happens when loading the bookmarks,
> because konqueror startup isn't affected and also the unpatched rekonq.
>
> what do you think about the patch? shall I continue on it?
>
> regards,
> mathias
>
>
> [1] http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=237390
>


More information about the rekonq mailing list