[rekonq] Extending rekonq through plug-ins?

[Andrea Diamantini]

On Tuesday 09 February 2010 14:48:08 Krenar Qehaja wrote:
> On Sunday 07 February 2010 23:33:42 Andrea Diamantini wrote:
> > Not for now.
> > Our secret plans are to create a lightweight, stable and enough featured
> > browser based on Webkit & KDE.
> 
> Hi Andrea,
> 
> I probably wasn't clear enough. I was merely trying say: extending rekonq
> through scripting languages using Kross (in the KOffice fashion) or simply
> using QtScript (in Amarok, Chrome and Mozilla Firefox jetpacks fashion)
> instead of using binary plug-ins.
> 
> I'm a day-to-day user of rekonq but I really miss some Firefox extensions
> and can't make a full switch.
> 
> Regards

Hi Krenar,
again, the answer is: "not for now".
Problems about that are:
1) I'd like focusing yet development on creating  a lightweight, stable and 
enough featured browser based on Webkit & KDE. :)
2) I'm not sure what is the best way to go for these "plugins": 
I'm probably not interested on create just a dev platform over rekonq (binary 
or script based, no matter). Supporting (in example) Firefox, Chrome or (at 
least) konqueror plugins seem (to me) the right way to go.
Anyway, before moving in this direction I really need to understand how to do 
this and how this will change rekonq behaviour, performances, development.

Last thing: I'm not a Firefox daily user and I never use its extensions (no, 
wait, I'm using 3: Firebug, AdBlockPlus && MoonLight.)
Can I ask you what extensions you are used to use?

Cheers, 
-- 
Andrea Diamantini, adjam
GPG Fingerprint: 57DE 8E32 7D1A 0E16 AA52 59D8 84F9 3ECD DBF9 730F

rekonq project
WEB: http://rekonq.sourceforge.net
IRC: rekonq at freenode