[rekonq] Re: anyone else having problems with rekonq and Flash?

Rohan Garg rohangarg at ubuntu.com
Thu Dec 30 12:00:02 CET 2010


Hi Shane
The issues you mention areactually a kio issues and are fixed with KDE RC 2
...
On 30-Dec-2010 4:20 PM, "Shane Lazar" <shane at archlinux.us> wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 11:49 AM, Alexander van Loon <
> a.vanloon at alexandervanloon.nl> wrote:
>
>> On Wednesday 29 December 2010 22:00:31 Alexander van Loon wrote:
>> > Today I migrated to Kubuntu 10.10 on my desktop, after having used that
>> distribution for a few months on my notebook
>> > already. Now that I’m using KDE and Rekonq full time I noticed that
there
>> are some problems with Flash (the 64-bit beta in
>> > my case to be precise). I suspect that those problems are not related
to
>> Flash itself, but rather KDE’s implementation of
>> > WebKit.
>> >
>> > Please see https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=261523 for a
description
>> of my problems. There are other bugs related to
>> > Flash on KDE’s Bugzilla -
>> https://bugs.kde.org/buglist.cgi?quicksearch=rekonq+flash - but none with
>> any comment from a
>> > developer. I searched through the archives of this mailing list for the
>> last few months, but Flash isn’t mentioned there
>> either.
>> > Google didn’t tell me anything either, except for relatively old forum
>> posts, which I considered no longer relevant. I expected
>> > to read that other people would be affected by this problem as well,
>> because Flash is unfortunately so important. Are there
>> > any other people experiencing problems, and are there any known
>> solutions?
>>
>> Someone commented on the bug report I mentioned and wrote that this was a
>> known issue which is already fixed for the
>> next RC release of KDE SC 4.6.
>> _______________________________________________
>> rekonq mailing list
>> rekonq at kde.org
>> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/rekonq
>>
>
>
> Sad to say that over the past few months rekonq has become progressively
> more buggy and slower... I now use Chromium instead but I just compiled
> rekonq from git and I can say that on Arch 64-bit with KDE 4.6 from
unstable
> the following do not work.
>
> - Flash. When I stopped using rekonq only Flash on YouTube was broken...
Now
> it seems it does not work at all... not even the about page.
> - GMail fails to load... though new Twitter seems to work.
>
> It was really nice to have a good KDE browser, but in this state there are
> too many deal breakers. I hope rekonq becomes usable again soon.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/rekonq/attachments/20101230/ccf513e3/attachment.htm 


More information about the rekonq mailing list