[rekonq] About Rekonq doc

[Albert Astals Cid]

A Dimarts, 31 d'agost de 2010, laurent Montel va escriure:
> On mardi 31 août 2010 01:02:04 Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> > Hi, until yesterday, KDE translators have been translated a doc that was
> > located at
> > http://websvn.kde.org/trunk/extragear/network/doc/rekonq/?pathrev=1169512
> > 
> > Today/Yesterday Laurent removed it citing "moved to gitorious"
> 
> I looked at git source and saw a doc. And in extragear this doc was not the
> same, and not compile by default so for me rekonq dev forgot to remove it
> when it moved to git. Perhaps it's not an error but for me the "two" doc
> was different.
> 
> > I went to http://www.gitorious.org/rekonq/mainline/trees/master/docs and
> > found another docbook. Hurray for duplication!  That i have no idea if it
> > is newer, older or the same.
> > 
> > The thing is that currently the KDE l10n workflow does not allow
> > translation of docbooks not hosted in svn, so with Laurent removal of the
> > doc in extragear/network, rekonq doc is effectively untranslatable. Not
> > sure it matters, because if it was older than the docu in gitorious it's
> > not that bad anyway.
> 
> Waou... I didn't know that doc from apps which is in git is untranslatable.
> Not good.
> I thought that it was as po file.
> 
> So kdevelop doc is not translatable too...

kdevelop does not have doc, or so i was told.

> 
> So it's necessary to have a svn access for doc and git access for code.
> 
> So feel free to revert my commit (but we must update doc I think)

Yes, someone should put the updated doc meanwhile we (that is I) work on a 
solution that lets docs in git be translated.

Albert

> 
> 
> Regards
> 
> > So yeah, we should fix this.
> > 
> > Albert