[rekonq] [RFC] the road to rekonq 0.3.0

[Jon de Andrés Frías]

About the urlbar with runners, i've been playing a while with it. I'm actually 
making a runner to get google suggestions using opensearch, the library is re-
used of course. I have some problems with this runner and the threads that the 
runnermanager launches.

the use of runners can have some problems when the sorting them, actually i'm 
sorting the runner matches using their relevance but it's also needed to sort 
by runner type.

I'll post another video of the urlbar soon.

Regards.

On Friday 09 October 2009 10:09:41 Andrea Diamantini wrote:
> On Friday 09 October 2009 03:07:24 jonas gastal wrote:
> > I think "last visited sites" sounds better.
> 
> I think I explained badly Lionel's idea.
> He prefers "last closed tabs" instead of "last visited sites" because he
>  said last visited sites are just the first 8 entries of the history. So,
>  no useful information from there.
> Last closed tabs are last 8 (max) tabs closed, so perhaps it's more
> interesting info. What do you think about?
> 
> > In the roadmap there is no mention of "awesomebar" there is "oneurlbar"
> > planned for 0.3, are those the same?
> 
> No, in rekonq 0.2 there was one urlbar for each webview. Now we have just
>  ONE urlbar for each mainwindow.
> The awesome bar is a new urlbar based on krunner (alt + f2 in standard kde
> installation).
> I never worked on. I heard about Lionel, Ivan and/or someone else playing
>  with that, but for example I'm aware of problems with history management.
>  We need to share konqueror history before.
> I'm thinking about a general implementation for kdewebkit of this (shared
> history) but obviously I need time (kde 4.5?)
> 
> If we wanna work on that bringing other directions (change actual urlbar,
> implement a new runner, etc..) just tell it here.
> 
> Anyway, please, take in mind I promised kubuntu and opensuse packagers to
> release a stable version before their next release (29/10 and 12/11)
>  because this is going to be our first release in their official repos.
> 
> > What kind of docs do you want to write for 0.3? Handbook?
> 
> yes
>