[rekonq] [RFC] the road to rekonq 0.3.0

[jonas gastal]

I think "last visited sites" sounds better.
In the roadmap there is no mention of "awesomebar" there is "oneurlbar"
planned for 0.3, are those the same?
What kind of docs do you want to write for 0.3? Handbook?

On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 1:50 AM, Ronny Scholz <ronny_scholz at web.de> wrote:

> Am Freitag 09 Oktober 2009 00:13:07 schrieb Andrea Diamantini:
> > Here we are again, speaking about our next release and last things to do
> > before.
> > I'm really happy to be here again writing this, rekonq 0.2 release was
> >  August, 21th, so less than 2 months after we are just ready for our next
> >  batch :)
> >
> > I'd like to point out here the things to do before our first
> > "QuiteStableSureRocking" release:
> >
> > - write docs: help, please. Just one page, ten lines.. :)
> > - unit tests: I started yesterday working on, don't really know when
> >  they'll be ready
> > - fix tabbar: I'm thinking about setCornerWidget here, I'll try after
> this
> >  mail
> >
> > :)
> >
> > - add tabs action to shortcuts configurator
> > - ask user about resend form data on reload (should be trivial, but...?)
> >
> > Some days ago, Lionel pointed out the question about choosing removing
> >  "last visited sites" and replacing with "last closed tabs".
> > I'd like to know your opinion about. For me, it's the same :)
> >
> > After this fixes and cleaned bugzilla, we'll release 0.2.90. The time to
> > translate and hear first voices (2 weeks at least) and we'll have rekonq
> >  0.3.
> >
> > Here we are, plans disclosed :)
> > Waiting for your comments,
> >
>
> Wasn't the awesomebar also scheduled for rekonq 0.3.0?
> I read in the mailing list that the default searchengine bug will not be
> fixed
> because of the upcoming awesomebar integration. Can't wait for this :-)
>
> And I like "last visited sites" better. It sounds less technical.
> _______________________________________________
> rekonq mailing list
> rekonq at kde.org
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/rekonq
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/rekonq/attachments/20091009/bc8c6045/attachment.htm