[rekonq] One process per tab: TODO list for 0.3 [RFC]

[Lionel Chauvin]

> For general consensus I mean you, me, pano, ivan, lindsay... others??
> Now we are 2 vs 0 :)
> Plus hearing some opinions from kde-usability staff. I'm interested in
> their ideas about rekonq  :)

3 vs 0 with Ivan.

> I didn't understand this. If we stop two or three weeks development in
> master branch (continuing that on multitask one), stabilizing code and
> releasing a full KDE support rekonq, what's the problem? WebkitKDE is a
> library, rekonq is an app. They are surely different. And have surely
> different targets. Perhaps things go smooths and we can release a
> "multitask 0.3 rekonq", perhaps not. And we have to work a bit more on it.
> That's all!

Ok.

> No, sorry. QWebView is a window.

QWebView is a QWidget:
http://doc.trolltech.com/4.5/qwebview.html

> And in my first idea about (again, I can
> be wrong) the tabwidget is in the rekonq main application. the tabs (so,
> the WebViews) will become separate apps.

Yes it is like that. I don't say we must keep tabwidget in the rekonq_tab process. I say that it is easier to duplicate something compiling and remove after.

> Yes, I was saying just I'm not used to work with dbus..

idem :)


      
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/rekonq/attachments/20090811/417e1205/attachment.htm